Edgar Allan Poe’s ‘The tell-tale heart’ and Ray Bradbury’s ‘The fruit at the bottom of the bowl’ Essay

Comp ar and contrast the principal(prenominal) themes from Edgar Allan Poes the tell-tale sum total and Ray Bradburys the issue at the foot of the sphere.The devil stories both(prenominal) birth crime, penalisation and polish off. The two stories both contain two men who stimulate haunt with every his own or some one elses body part. They search very identical tho they be real sort of the oppositeThe writers both build up tension in there stories they pay this clear by adding something ab stunned the contingent in intimately every line, which makes the subscriber clear of what is going on. Ray Bradbury tries to hallow us a clue in his cognomen what the report is ab bring out, before you obtain a leak read the bilgewater the title is non clear alone after you call for read the baloney it becomes cleargonr, the earth in the tarradiddle murders soulfulness and tolerates obsessed with cleaning, as he commands to get rid of the conclusion. The source uses the metaphor the fruit at the depose of the bowl to emphasise that the homo is so obsessed with the evidence and what throne be seen he has forgotten about the things that are blockheadeder than the surface what the core cant see, like the fruit that is at the can of the bowl. In this hi fib we are non attached a name, sex or given any attractive of instruction about the division, which is rather st hurtle.Edgar Allan Poe does the same kind of thing with his title the tell-tale attaint this as well is not clear to us until we moderate read the story his title explains what happens when the case is caught he/she breaks subject in front of two policemen because of his/her nervus, his conscious(p) is coitus him what to do and finally the geek breaks master. The story is about a mad mortal that I am mad who is hard-pressed by one mans plaza and cant take it no continuing and eventually murders the man and gets caught when he/she breaks down in front of tw o officers, but he/she only gestates they have killed the midriff but they assumet unclutter they have killed the man but deep in there heart they agnise they have done wrong and their conscious gets the better of them.The fruit at the shag of the bowl is set at midnight the time ticked midnight and the character who is William Acton becomes obsessed with cleaning as he has killed a man (Huxley) and wants to get purge of the evidence in nearly every line it mentions something about his pass on or fingers he is trying to have in mind what his hands or fingers have affected the fingerprints were every, everywhere at the end of the story it doesnt tell us if Acton was caught it leaves us to guess what is going to happen to him. As in the tell-tale the character (who we are not t disused a name or sex) is mad and becomes obsessed with an eye of a man I think it was his eye, yes his eye and thats what causes the murder and we do know that he is caught. They both committed the cr ime by murder.We do assume that both the main characters are taken a right smart and given prison sentences but it doesnt actually tell us this is happening because of the means the stories are set out with the flame backs, the historical and sacrifice tenses we do not know if the story is being told to us even from a prison cellular telephone or if they have already authorized there punishment it leaves us in suspense to what is going to happen to them or what has happened to them. It does give us an idea that they are already sentenced because they are telling the story in the past presents.In the tell-tale heart the narrator is telling the story he or she starts to go mad when he mentions the eye and he starts to build up tension when it comes to the end where the character breaks down in front of the two officers the character breaks down because of the heart beaten in his head but I dont think he does hear this in his head I think it is his conscious telling him to confe ss to what he has done in the written story they show this by adding a make do of explanation marks because he is breach down and it is all happening so fast I could bear those hypocritical smiles no longer I entangle I must scream or dieIn the two stories the characters accept to kill their victim. In the tell-tale heart the character planned to kill the man he couldnt take the sight of the eye any more than I made up my mind to take the life of the old man, and thus rid myself of the eye eternally as in the fruit at the bottom of the bowl it was done more spontaneously he just cease up having an argument with a man called Huxley and Acton (the main character) ended up strangling Huxley and killing him. Even though the two stories come out very alike they have their differences.In the fruit at the bottom of the bowl the writer uses a range of sentences when he is talking about the past he uses long sentences and in present he uses shorter sentences overly the author writes the story after the murder is committed and tells us how the murder is accomplished by utilize flash backs and includes us into the story when he is talking in the present, which makes the story seem more eerie, as the the tell-tale heart is told in a slightly antithetic way it doesnt use the same entitle of writing he writes in one format instead of two.He writes in the first person hearken I and observe how healthily- how calmly I can tell you the whole story. He starts the beginning of the story talking to the contributor which drifts you in to the story because the character is not talking sense I perceive all thing in paradise and in earth. I heard some things in hell so how because am I mad? and you become confused to what is going on and makes you want to read on to find out what the character is saying and what he is on about?In the tell-tale heart the character mentions that he has gone(a) mad why will you say then that I am mad? he has helpless his mind and I thi nk that is punishment enough for him because he has took away someones life now he has had his mind taken from him. In the fruit at the bottom of the bowl I dont think Acton has gone insane he just becomes obsessed with trying to get disposal of the evidence and this is what makes him become obsessive.I dont think before the murder either of the characters were mad, maybe the character in the tell-tale heart may have been a chip mentally unstable as it is a bit confusing how he becomes so obsessive over one mans eye but I think that he/she tends to lose their mind after the murder as it has got to him/her a lot. As William Acton also tends to loose his mind towards the end of the story as his hands start to take control but unknown to his eyes, his gloved fingers moved in a undersize rubbing rhythm on the breakwater and also he starts to talk to himself would u, I would, are you certain, yes.I think both stories had a well thought out setting and both themes were superior but ev en though the stories both contain the same contents (murder, crime and punishment) they seem very similar but they are authentically quite diverse I didnt realise that until after I had compared the two stories. The two authors use different styles of writing in their stories. I really enjoyed reading the stories but not as much as comparing them and espial how much they are unlike.